<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Spank Your Bank Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog</link>
	<description>SyB stumbled upon a young mum with two toddlers and a large mortgage. Her job is to find out about everything that the banks are less keen for you to know and to tell you ALL about it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be nice to the staff at your bank (CEOs and high paid people don&#8217;t count ;)) by Lisa Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=666#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=666#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just discovered Spank Your Bank - great concept, to vent the frustration and anger directly to those who can change the situation. It could be expanded to include more of the smaller banks like Bank West and even non-bank lenders like First Mac. Thanks for the excellent research on a range of topics including the investment interrelationship of the banks. Everyone&#039;s in bed with everyone else - kind of neutralises the idea of competition.  

For Paul, Denise Brailey at www.bfcsa.com.au, (Banking and Financial Consumer Support Association, a voluntary organisation) has been assisting people in Australia and New Zealand to get justice in the banking and financial sector and their regulators. BFCSA have also been working with the media to get the message out there about Lo Doc loan and bank maladministration. I recommend you join the BFCSA. Good luck with the CBA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just discovered Spank Your Bank &#8211; great concept, to vent the frustration and anger directly to those who can change the situation. It could be expanded to include more of the smaller banks like Bank West and even non-bank lenders like First Mac. Thanks for the excellent research on a range of topics including the investment interrelationship of the banks. Everyone&#8217;s in bed with everyone else &#8211; kind of neutralises the idea of competition.  </p>
<p>For Paul, Denise Brailey at <a href="http://www.bfcsa.com.au">http://www.bfcsa.com.au</a>, (Banking and Financial Consumer Support Association, a voluntary organisation) has been assisting people in Australia and New Zealand to get justice in the banking and financial sector and their regulators. BFCSA have also been working with the media to get the message out there about Lo Doc loan and bank maladministration. I recommend you join the BFCSA. Good luck with the CBA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Have you seen the Bank Ownership Tree? by Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=641#comment-4515</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=641#comment-4515</guid>
		<description>I have been trying to do some (very) rough calculations on who owns what. The Nominee holdings of the big banks are hard to make sense of and it can be argued that it is the underlying share holders of these Nominee accounts that actually own the stock, not the bank who simply run the Nominee service on behalf of its investment customers.

The bank argument for withholding interest rate drops from customer has always been that it is preserving the profits for its shareholders, and very laudable this is too :-) Still, it got me wondering about the overlap between the shareholders and the bank customers. More specifically, the Super Fund holdings of the major banks.

As everyone who is or has been in work should have a Super Fund, and given that the default balanced Super Fund contains about 50% Oz shares, it seemed likely that the big bangs would make up a healthy portion of this.

Anyway, here are my rough initial calculations based on some very big assumption. Happy for any correction of errors or comments! I have taken the CBA as the example.


CBA Market Cap	$83,000,000,000
Total Super Funds Under Management (Oz)	$1,800,000,000,000
All Ords Market Cap	$1,200,000,000,000
Big Assumptions here:-	
Balanced Fund % of Oz Equities	50
CBA Market Cap as % of All Ords MC	7
All Ords held in Super Funds (50% of total Super FUM)	$900,000,000,000
CBA Portion held in Super Funds (7% of Super Funds Equity holiding)	$63,000,000,000
%of CBA held by Super Funds	76

So, 76% of the CBA is held by the Super Funds. Seems a bit high, but the point is that *WE* are the shareholders *AND* the customer. A 10% dividend on our Super share holdings is worth very little compared to a 0.5% drop on our Mortgage! Surely as majority shareholders we should be able to influence their commercial decision making :-)

Gordon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to do some (very) rough calculations on who owns what. The Nominee holdings of the big banks are hard to make sense of and it can be argued that it is the underlying share holders of these Nominee accounts that actually own the stock, not the bank who simply run the Nominee service on behalf of its investment customers.</p>
<p>The bank argument for withholding interest rate drops from customer has always been that it is preserving the profits for its shareholders, and very laudable this is too <img src='http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Still, it got me wondering about the overlap between the shareholders and the bank customers. More specifically, the Super Fund holdings of the major banks.</p>
<p>As everyone who is or has been in work should have a Super Fund, and given that the default balanced Super Fund contains about 50% Oz shares, it seemed likely that the big bangs would make up a healthy portion of this.</p>
<p>Anyway, here are my rough initial calculations based on some very big assumption. Happy for any correction of errors or comments! I have taken the CBA as the example.</p>
<p>CBA Market Cap	$83,000,000,000<br />
Total Super Funds Under Management (Oz)	$1,800,000,000,000<br />
All Ords Market Cap	$1,200,000,000,000<br />
Big Assumptions here:-<br />
Balanced Fund % of Oz Equities	50<br />
CBA Market Cap as % of All Ords MC	7<br />
All Ords held in Super Funds (50% of total Super FUM)	$900,000,000,000<br />
CBA Portion held in Super Funds (7% of Super Funds Equity holiding)	$63,000,000,000<br />
%of CBA held by Super Funds	76</p>
<p>So, 76% of the CBA is held by the Super Funds. Seems a bit high, but the point is that *WE* are the shareholders *AND* the customer. A 10% dividend on our Super share holdings is worth very little compared to a 0.5% drop on our Mortgage! Surely as majority shareholders we should be able to influence their commercial decision making <img src='http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Gordon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Claiming your Medical Tax Offset by Esther</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=504#comment-4512</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 10:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=504#comment-4512</guid>
		<description>Good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mortgage Insurance &#8211; Sex, Lies and Deception (But without the Sex) part one by Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=18#comment-3893</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sybblog.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-3893</guid>
		<description>LMI can be avoided by certain professions

Not sure if many people know this, but a number of lenders including CBA, NAB, and St George will waive the LMI requirement for certain professions such as doctors (and those in health care) for loans up to 90% LVR. 

The sad thing is that many brokers dont even know about this and the lenders themselves will never go out of there way to tell you about it. You need to do a lot of your own research to avoid LMI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMI can be avoided by certain professions</p>
<p>Not sure if many people know this, but a number of lenders including CBA, NAB, and St George will waive the LMI requirement for certain professions such as doctors (and those in health care) for loans up to 90% LVR. </p>
<p>The sad thing is that many brokers dont even know about this and the lenders themselves will never go out of there way to tell you about it. You need to do a lot of your own research to avoid LMI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be nice to the staff at your bank (CEOs and high paid people don&#8217;t count ;)) by Paul Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=666#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=666#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>To let you all know that I have pursued the CBA and Colonial First on my own for some years.

Over the last 6 months I have developed that complaint into an offer from them to buy my silence. I won&#039;t sign it.

So here is a summary, this is all from Senior Customer Service staff, including the head of that group.

One of their staff stated in a letter that, for CFS, &quot;We are aware you have been given incorrect information&quot;. On asking what he was doing about that his answer was &quot;We have asked&quot;. I asked again. &quot;What have you asked for and who have you asked?&quot; Question avoided at all levels.

The call centre staff for both CFS and CBA do not know a thing, they make it up. My partner rang for the first time a few weeks ago to ask for a withdrawal and the first answer she got was &quot;You get NO money&quot;. That from a Thai girl. I took over the call and told her the facts. My partner now has had a partial withdrawal done.

Another Senior Customer Service staff member made this admission and offer :

&quot;After reviewing all of the available information in regard to your complaint, I would like to offer you a refund of all adviser fees paid, totalling $2,558.59, as a goodwill payment in full and final settlement of this matter. In addition, we will remove the adviser listed on your account and ensure that adviser fees cease from this point. If you would like to accept this offer, please sign and return the attached settlement agreement to us by post so that payment can be arranged. This can be posted to me:....

&quot;We recognise that although you received and proceeded with advice provided by Ms xxxxxx in 2005 (a blatant lie as she put it into a fund I did NOT want at all), the ongoing service provided to you has not been of the standard that we aim to provide CFPL clients. Based upon this, we would like to extend this goodwill offer to you in order to settle this matter. &quot;

Goodwill? From a bank? Have you ever heard such crap? They never make goodwill payments unless it is to avoid their real obligation, far more than they can count in this case. Notice also she said full and FINAL. It weasn&#039;t final at all and you see below.

In other words she admitted that the so called &quot;financial advisors&quot; actually never give advice but they deduct fees from all accounts once a week at rates applicable to your amount.

That is, they do not perform any function but still take the fees for doing nothing. That is why I was offered  refund of my fees. Because none of them earned a cent.

At one stage, in 2008, I was forced to ring Colonial First State as they had frozen that fund, stopping withdrawals.

CFS told me to ring my financial advisor upon which I told them I didn&#039;t have one. Their advice&quot; Ahh, but you do and you have had a succession of such advisors, all of whom have taken fees for their benefit from your account.&quot; I asked who my current one was and rang him. After explaining the problem and asking for his financial advice his response was &quot;I can&#039;t help you. Ring CFS.&quot; He continued taking fees.

As CFS and CBA are one and the same I found that less than amusing and just told him to &quot;Go away&quot;. No swearing, that occurred after I hung up.

I pursued that offer further and refused it and signing any waiver. Eventually it was referred to their boss who offered me :

A full refund of my fees,
Estimated payment for lost interest, and
$1000 for the &quot;poor service&quot; and suffering throught their lies (my words that last little bit.

She had asked me, by email, what amount I would accept to settle this matter. I told her and she reduced it. Anger, deceit.

So, you see. All you have to do is tell them you know their advisors do nothing and provide no service and, as such, exist in name only, not a service at all.

Then insist on a full refund of your fees, lost interest and compensation for having been defrauded.

You will get an offer. I still won&#039;t sign it as I want to give this story to the media so the whole charade is exposed fully.

I have no doubt no other bank&#039;s &quot;advisors&quot; do anything either.

Ask yourself if you have EVER had one word of advice from these &quot;advisors&quot;. DId they ever even tell you they were your advisor.

Get off your backside and rip into this bank, and others.

It&#039;s way past time we fought back and got OUR money back. All of it.

As an example of how much they are ripping off, say they have 1000 clients with $1 million in their account. They deduct an amount every week. My partner has $35 deducted every week and she has only $100 k in there. WHich equates to .018% per annum. These are only the trailing fees mind you.

Those 1000 with $1 milion in their accounts woud have deductions of $18200 each per annum. For 1000 of them that would be a deuction of 1.82 million dollars. For doing nothing and providing no service.

Just to check the rich weren&#039;t getting some service the poorer of us don&#039;t get I asked a profession psychiatrist I know who has funds in there and has most of his career. I asked him &quot;Have you ever heard from your financial adviser? Have they ever advised you of anything?&quot; The answer was &quot;No, never&quot;.

So just imagine how big this fraud is.

Please spread the word and make sure you tell people to persist and escalate the problem as initially they will deny everything. You must persist and, at times, become aggressive to get a result. The meek inherit advisor fee deductions only.

I have approached one media outlet, just today but will be approaching as many as I can think of. Including the senior politicians on both sides as they would love to rip into bansks. Especially Mr Swan.

If you wait for media exposure and admission and negotiation etc you wil get far less than you would now while they are still trying to contain the damage.

To be blunt, it&#039;s worse than the Mafia. At least they tell you to bend over first, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To let you all know that I have pursued the CBA and Colonial First on my own for some years.</p>
<p>Over the last 6 months I have developed that complaint into an offer from them to buy my silence. I won&#8217;t sign it.</p>
<p>So here is a summary, this is all from Senior Customer Service staff, including the head of that group.</p>
<p>One of their staff stated in a letter that, for CFS, &#8220;We are aware you have been given incorrect information&#8221;. On asking what he was doing about that his answer was &#8220;We have asked&#8221;. I asked again. &#8220;What have you asked for and who have you asked?&#8221; Question avoided at all levels.</p>
<p>The call centre staff for both CFS and CBA do not know a thing, they make it up. My partner rang for the first time a few weeks ago to ask for a withdrawal and the first answer she got was &#8220;You get NO money&#8221;. That from a Thai girl. I took over the call and told her the facts. My partner now has had a partial withdrawal done.</p>
<p>Another Senior Customer Service staff member made this admission and offer :</p>
<p>&#8220;After reviewing all of the available information in regard to your complaint, I would like to offer you a refund of all adviser fees paid, totalling $2,558.59, as a goodwill payment in full and final settlement of this matter. In addition, we will remove the adviser listed on your account and ensure that adviser fees cease from this point. If you would like to accept this offer, please sign and return the attached settlement agreement to us by post so that payment can be arranged. This can be posted to me:&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;We recognise that although you received and proceeded with advice provided by Ms xxxxxx in 2005 (a blatant lie as she put it into a fund I did NOT want at all), the ongoing service provided to you has not been of the standard that we aim to provide CFPL clients. Based upon this, we would like to extend this goodwill offer to you in order to settle this matter. &#8221;</p>
<p>Goodwill? From a bank? Have you ever heard such crap? They never make goodwill payments unless it is to avoid their real obligation, far more than they can count in this case. Notice also she said full and FINAL. It weasn&#8217;t final at all and you see below.</p>
<p>In other words she admitted that the so called &#8220;financial advisors&#8221; actually never give advice but they deduct fees from all accounts once a week at rates applicable to your amount.</p>
<p>That is, they do not perform any function but still take the fees for doing nothing. That is why I was offered  refund of my fees. Because none of them earned a cent.</p>
<p>At one stage, in 2008, I was forced to ring Colonial First State as they had frozen that fund, stopping withdrawals.</p>
<p>CFS told me to ring my financial advisor upon which I told them I didn&#8217;t have one. Their advice&#8221; Ahh, but you do and you have had a succession of such advisors, all of whom have taken fees for their benefit from your account.&#8221; I asked who my current one was and rang him. After explaining the problem and asking for his financial advice his response was &#8220;I can&#8217;t help you. Ring CFS.&#8221; He continued taking fees.</p>
<p>As CFS and CBA are one and the same I found that less than amusing and just told him to &#8220;Go away&#8221;. No swearing, that occurred after I hung up.</p>
<p>I pursued that offer further and refused it and signing any waiver. Eventually it was referred to their boss who offered me :</p>
<p>A full refund of my fees,<br />
Estimated payment for lost interest, and<br />
$1000 for the &#8220;poor service&#8221; and suffering throught their lies (my words that last little bit.</p>
<p>She had asked me, by email, what amount I would accept to settle this matter. I told her and she reduced it. Anger, deceit.</p>
<p>So, you see. All you have to do is tell them you know their advisors do nothing and provide no service and, as such, exist in name only, not a service at all.</p>
<p>Then insist on a full refund of your fees, lost interest and compensation for having been defrauded.</p>
<p>You will get an offer. I still won&#8217;t sign it as I want to give this story to the media so the whole charade is exposed fully.</p>
<p>I have no doubt no other bank&#8217;s &#8220;advisors&#8221; do anything either.</p>
<p>Ask yourself if you have EVER had one word of advice from these &#8220;advisors&#8221;. DId they ever even tell you they were your advisor.</p>
<p>Get off your backside and rip into this bank, and others.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s way past time we fought back and got OUR money back. All of it.</p>
<p>As an example of how much they are ripping off, say they have 1000 clients with $1 million in their account. They deduct an amount every week. My partner has $35 deducted every week and she has only $100 k in there. WHich equates to .018% per annum. These are only the trailing fees mind you.</p>
<p>Those 1000 with $1 milion in their accounts woud have deductions of $18200 each per annum. For 1000 of them that would be a deuction of 1.82 million dollars. For doing nothing and providing no service.</p>
<p>Just to check the rich weren&#8217;t getting some service the poorer of us don&#8217;t get I asked a profession psychiatrist I know who has funds in there and has most of his career. I asked him &#8220;Have you ever heard from your financial adviser? Have they ever advised you of anything?&#8221; The answer was &#8220;No, never&#8221;.</p>
<p>So just imagine how big this fraud is.</p>
<p>Please spread the word and make sure you tell people to persist and escalate the problem as initially they will deny everything. You must persist and, at times, become aggressive to get a result. The meek inherit advisor fee deductions only.</p>
<p>I have approached one media outlet, just today but will be approaching as many as I can think of. Including the senior politicians on both sides as they would love to rip into bansks. Especially Mr Swan.</p>
<p>If you wait for media exposure and admission and negotiation etc you wil get far less than you would now while they are still trying to contain the damage.</p>
<p>To be blunt, it&#8217;s worse than the Mafia. At least they tell you to bend over first, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kids AND a Mortgage – Is it Possible? Solution Two: Buy Somewhere Cheaper by Josep</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=470#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Josep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=470#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>Credit is the backbone of a redomn monetary system. Banks were created by the constitution as a great vehicle to have both capitalism and full employment. The private sector by itself cannot create full employment because of financial constraints and needs buffer for uncertainty and the government has to step in. Banks hold a unique position, else credit will be difficult and pricey. Banks have this unique ability to lend by expanding out its balance sheet. Preventing an easy expansion of the balance sheet will just increase the loan rates. The settlement balances at the Federal Reserve have just two roles   settlement and help satisfy the household need for currency notes. The central bank is also the lender of the last resort and can lend as much as possible. The whole system is designed wonderfully so that entrepreneurs, academicians, scientists, engineers, artists, advertisers, sales persons, managers, HR, unskilled laborers can make use of this and increase the quality of life for themselves and others. If the households permanently decide to use more cash, the central bank can help banks slowly reach that state where they keep more settlement balances, lending in unlimited quantities in the meantime. Its a misunderstanding of the system and poor economics which led to the crisis. Economic advisors to governments have no concept of  domestic private sector deficit  in their analysis. If they had noticed that the private sector was getting weak, they would not have allowed a credit boom to have happened. Instead they supported the boom and ignored reports showing scams and forgeries. It is neither low interest rates or low reserve requirerments which caused this crisis. Blaming the crisis for these two things is like blaming the invention of fire instead of blaming the fire prevention system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit is the backbone of a redomn monetary system. Banks were created by the constitution as a great vehicle to have both capitalism and full employment. The private sector by itself cannot create full employment because of financial constraints and needs buffer for uncertainty and the government has to step in. Banks hold a unique position, else credit will be difficult and pricey. Banks have this unique ability to lend by expanding out its balance sheet. Preventing an easy expansion of the balance sheet will just increase the loan rates. The settlement balances at the Federal Reserve have just two roles   settlement and help satisfy the household need for currency notes. The central bank is also the lender of the last resort and can lend as much as possible. The whole system is designed wonderfully so that entrepreneurs, academicians, scientists, engineers, artists, advertisers, sales persons, managers, HR, unskilled laborers can make use of this and increase the quality of life for themselves and others. If the households permanently decide to use more cash, the central bank can help banks slowly reach that state where they keep more settlement balances, lending in unlimited quantities in the meantime. Its a misunderstanding of the system and poor economics which led to the crisis. Economic advisors to governments have no concept of  domestic private sector deficit  in their analysis. If they had noticed that the private sector was getting weak, they would not have allowed a credit boom to have happened. Instead they supported the boom and ignored reports showing scams and forgeries. It is neither low interest rates or low reserve requirerments which caused this crisis. Blaming the crisis for these two things is like blaming the invention of fire instead of blaming the fire prevention system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Four, your record profits make me Grumpy! by Naty</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=530#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>Naty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=530#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>I agree with Katiana 1000%. The people innnrug chase are ignorant scumbags who are just plain DUMB when it comes to this crisis we are experiencing with the housing crunch.I owe a first mortgage of $320K and a home equity line of $200K thru Chase at an average of 7% interest. I needed to make a decision BEFORE I get bad credit so I called the  experts  at Chase and explained to them my situation. I told them I was NOT behind at the moment but very soon I will be. I told them that the easy way to solve my financial crisis was to do what most people are doing in my situation which is to WALK AWAY! I told them at Chase that if they could modify my present home equity loan with them, NOT WRITE IT OFF, just give me say 1 year with 2% interest only so as I could sell the house and NOT LOOSE MY GOOD CREDIT, then I could do this! THEY REFUSED, PERIOD. They told me in order for them to even consider any modification, I would need to be in default. SO GUESS WHAT CHASE??? I now I am behind 2 months on both my 1st mortgage of $325K, as well as your $200K mortgage which will certainly be wiped when the home finally gets forclosed and sold eventually for about $250K.I sincerely hope you  bankers  get an understanding as to how NOT to treat homeowners in my situation. YOU IDIOTS LEAVE US NO CHOICE BUT TO WALK AWAY      .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Katiana 1000%. The people innnrug chase are ignorant scumbags who are just plain DUMB when it comes to this crisis we are experiencing with the housing crunch.I owe a first mortgage of $320K and a home equity line of $200K thru Chase at an average of 7% interest. I needed to make a decision BEFORE I get bad credit so I called the  experts  at Chase and explained to them my situation. I told them I was NOT behind at the moment but very soon I will be. I told them that the easy way to solve my financial crisis was to do what most people are doing in my situation which is to WALK AWAY! I told them at Chase that if they could modify my present home equity loan with them, NOT WRITE IT OFF, just give me say 1 year with 2% interest only so as I could sell the house and NOT LOOSE MY GOOD CREDIT, then I could do this! THEY REFUSED, PERIOD. They told me in order for them to even consider any modification, I would need to be in default. SO GUESS WHAT CHASE??? I now I am behind 2 months on both my 1st mortgage of $325K, as well as your $200K mortgage which will certainly be wiped when the home finally gets forclosed and sold eventually for about $250K.I sincerely hope you  bankers  get an understanding as to how NOT to treat homeowners in my situation. YOU IDIOTS LEAVE US NO CHOICE BUT TO WALK AWAY      .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kids AND a Mortgage – Is it Possible? Solution One: Buy Something Cheaper by Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=466#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=466#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>If a loan modification will allow semnooe to keep their home without the undue hardships of living house poor, on the brink of foreclosure or bankrupcy, and with no leeway to save for retirement, then loan modification is good for both borrower and lender. But, you know that this is the absolute, biggest  ifs  of all  ifs.   What percentage of these homes are already seriously underwater?  And how many people are foolish enough to believe that this lost equity is coming back anytime soon?  In the five years granted by these freezes, it ain&#039;t gonna happen.  And even if that equity were somehow miracously recovered, the new lending and underwriting standards are going to prevent refinancing.  I mean, come on, who&#039;s going to lend semnooe making 75K a year, 800K to buy a house   no matter what their FICO scores?  That won&#039;t happen anymore.You are absolutely right, Al.  The biggest beneficiarys (sp) of this will be the lenders and lawyers.  Lender get to keep people paying their bills for a little while longer until the borrowers finally realize their  bad situation  is interminable.  The lawyers will be chasing fraud for years to come   wonder how many John Edwards we&#039;re going to create from this swamp?Let the housing market crash, let prices drop until median income buys the median priced house.  Nobody has to be homeless   there are going to a lot of really nice rentals available for a long time.  Even foreclosure comes off your credit after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a loan modification will allow semnooe to keep their home without the undue hardships of living house poor, on the brink of foreclosure or bankrupcy, and with no leeway to save for retirement, then loan modification is good for both borrower and lender. But, you know that this is the absolute, biggest  ifs  of all  ifs.   What percentage of these homes are already seriously underwater?  And how many people are foolish enough to believe that this lost equity is coming back anytime soon?  In the five years granted by these freezes, it ain&#8217;t gonna happen.  And even if that equity were somehow miracously recovered, the new lending and underwriting standards are going to prevent refinancing.  I mean, come on, who&#8217;s going to lend semnooe making 75K a year, 800K to buy a house   no matter what their FICO scores?  That won&#8217;t happen anymore.You are absolutely right, Al.  The biggest beneficiarys (sp) of this will be the lenders and lawyers.  Lender get to keep people paying their bills for a little while longer until the borrowers finally realize their  bad situation  is interminable.  The lawyers will be chasing fraud for years to come   wonder how many John Edwards we&#8217;re going to create from this swamp?Let the housing market crash, let prices drop until median income buys the median priced house.  Nobody has to be homeless   there are going to a lot of really nice rentals available for a long time.  Even foreclosure comes off your credit after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mortgage Insurance &#8211; Sex, Lies and Deception (But without the Sex) part one by sybblog</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=18#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>sybblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sybblog.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>Oh how frustrating! LMI really is terrible. And so many people are getting rejected for loans as a result of Lender&#039;s mortgage insurer policies when they can clearly show that they can handle the loan. 

Three possible options for getting around this are:
1. Get a 20% deposit (then Genworth or any other LMI doesn&#039;t get involved)
2. Try a bank that uses QBE LMI. They and Genworth are much of a muchness, but sometimes their policies vary slightly enough that you get passed with one but not the other.
3. Try going through a few different channels to apply for your loan. Sometimes it just takes the right mortgage broker to get you through. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seekhomeloans.com.au/html/s02_article/article_view.asp?art_id=351&amp;nav_cat_id=298&amp;nav_top_id=99&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seek Home Loans&lt;/a&gt; have helped others with this in the past and they might be able to help you.

Hope this helps! Good Luck and let us know how you go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh how frustrating! LMI really is terrible. And so many people are getting rejected for loans as a result of Lender&#8217;s mortgage insurer policies when they can clearly show that they can handle the loan. </p>
<p>Three possible options for getting around this are:<br />
1. Get a 20% deposit (then Genworth or any other LMI doesn&#8217;t get involved)<br />
2. Try a bank that uses QBE LMI. They and Genworth are much of a muchness, but sometimes their policies vary slightly enough that you get passed with one but not the other.<br />
3. Try going through a few different channels to apply for your loan. Sometimes it just takes the right mortgage broker to get you through. <a href="http://www.seekhomeloans.com.au/html/s02_article/article_view.asp?art_id=351&amp;nav_cat_id=298&amp;nav_top_id=99">Seek Home Loans</a> have helped others with this in the past and they might be able to help you.</p>
<p>Hope this helps! Good Luck and let us know how you go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mortgage Insurance &#8211; Sex, Lies and Deception (But without the Sex) part one by Marlita</title>
		<link>http://www.spankyourbank.com.au/blog/?p=18#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sybblog.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>Well ... I loved this blog.. Can&#039;t believe what has happened today... Turned down for our house loan... The reason... Lenders mortgage insurer see&#039;s our post code as a categorie 3 and as we are first home buyers and builders and were using some of our boosts as part deposit... Guess what their &quot; computer&quot; chucked a fit and refused!!!   What the hell!!!  Am so angry right now... If we were to build in the next town there would be no problem.. How the heck does that work?!?!  So at the moment I am not wanting to spank our bank they were as perplexed as us... I would like to hug genworth in the face with a chair!!!... Not sure were our options lye now do we give in andd keep renting or extend contract and look for another financier with a different  mortgage insurer... This was supposed to be an exciting chapter of our lives and thanks to mortgage. Insurance... It is one of the worst head f*cks imaginable.... Most ridiculous insurance ever!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230; I loved this blog.. Can&#8217;t believe what has happened today&#8230; Turned down for our house loan&#8230; The reason&#8230; Lenders mortgage insurer see&#8217;s our post code as a categorie 3 and as we are first home buyers and builders and were using some of our boosts as part deposit&#8230; Guess what their &#8221; computer&#8221; chucked a fit and refused!!!   What the hell!!!  Am so angry right now&#8230; If we were to build in the next town there would be no problem.. How the heck does that work?!?!  So at the moment I am not wanting to spank our bank they were as perplexed as us&#8230; I would like to hug genworth in the face with a chair!!!&#8230; Not sure were our options lye now do we give in andd keep renting or extend contract and look for another financier with a different  mortgage insurer&#8230; This was supposed to be an exciting chapter of our lives and thanks to mortgage. Insurance&#8230; It is one of the worst head f*cks imaginable&#8230;. Most ridiculous insurance ever!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
